Core stability vs Core Control
2 articles questioning the effectiveness of core stability training. Are we missing the key?
A note on Core Stability
A recent systematic review on the effects of isolated and integrated ‘core stability’ training on athletic performance measures showed mixed results for the role of core training in improving athletic performance but many studies suggest a strong and stable core provide a foundation for performance (Reed et al 2012). This paper concludes that targeted core stability training provides marginal benefits to athletic performance and lack of standardization for measurement of outcomes and training focused to improve core strength and stability pose difficulties.
Another recent publication concludes athletes are probably wasting their valuable training time by including extra-functional core stability training in their training routines (Brooks 2012).
So why is ‘core stability’ getting bad press? Is is because we are not identifying the site, direction and threshold of uncontrolled movement? Assessment is the key - of movement control. We need to identify the neurophysiological impairments in the movement system. Once established we can make a tailored retraining programme to fix the impairments.
We at The Performance Matrix propose we move from
‘Core Stability’ to Core Control - our process is all about finding and fixing the movement impairment
On rethinking core stability exercise programs
Brooks C 2012 Australasian Musculoskeletal Medicine 6 9-14
Core stability training has gained wide acceptance as a treatment for low back pain rehabilitation, maintenance of a healthy back, and improved sport performance. This article examines aspects of core stability/strength exercise program approaches, with a focus on research suggesting that core stability and core strengthening programs are misconceived. It outlines a brief overview of spinal stability research and its application to core stability/strengthening programs within both the rehabilitation and sport performance enhancement sectors and briefly explains why these programs violate essential motor control and training theory principles.
The effects of isolated and integrated 'core stability' training on athletic performance measures: a systematic review.
Reed CA, Ford KR, Myer GD, Hewett TE. Sports Med 2012; 42(8): 697-706
BACKGROUND: Core stability training, operationally defined as training focused to improve trunk and hip control, is an integral part of athletic development, yet little is known about its direct relation to athletic performance.
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review focuses on identification of the association between core stability and sports-related performance measures. A secondary objective was to identify difficulties encountered when trying to train core stability with the goal of improving athletic performance.
DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was employed to capture all articles related to athletic performance and core stability training that were identified using the electronic databases MEDLINE, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus™ (1982-June 2011).
STUDY SELECTION: A systematic approach was used to evaluate 179 articles identified for initial review. Studies that performed an intervention targeted toward the core and measured an outcome related to athletic or sport performances were included, while studies with a participant population aged 65 years or older were excluded. Twenty-four in total met the inclusionary criteria for review.
STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Studies were evaluated using the Physical Therapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. The 24 articles were separated into three groups, general performance (n = 8), lower extremity (n = 10) and upper extremity (n = 6), for ease of discussion.
RESULTS: In the majority of studies, core stability training was utilized in conjunction with more comprehensive exercise programmes. As such, many studies saw improvements in skills of general strengths such as maximum squat load and vertical leap. Surprisingly, not all studies reported measurable increases in specific core strength and stability measures following training. Additionally, investigations that targeted the core as the primary goal for improved outcome of training had mixed results.
LIMITATIONS: Core stability is rarely the sole component of an athletic development programme, making it difficult to directly isolate its affect on athletic performance. The population biases of some studies of athletic performance also confound the results.
CONCLUSIONS: Targeted core stability training provides marginal benefits to athletic performance. Conflicting findings and the lack of a standardization for measurement of outcomes and training focused to improve core strength and stability pose difficulties. Because of this, further research targeted to determine this relationship is necessary to better understand how core strength and stability affect athletic performance.
Week 5 & 6 Articles 2013
- TPM Workplace - First Port of Call for First Responders
- The Kinetic Medial Rotation Test (KMRT)
- Measures of Movement Health: Taking movement into account
- 3 TPM Pro Clinics identify what TPM can do for 'You, Your Clients, and Your Practice'
- The value of testing? The value of retraining
- Clinic Focus: Top Performance Delta
- Case Study
- Football Matrix
- Injury Prevention
- Kinetic Control
- Kinetic Control Education
- Kinetic Control Movement Therapists
- Mark Comerford
- Movement Analysis
- Movement Control
- Movement Control Impairments
- Movement Efficiency
- Movement Health
- Movement Matters
- Review 2012
- Review 2013
- Review 2014
- Review 2015
- Sarah Mottram
- Success Stories
- TPM Active
- TPM Elite
- TPM Network
- TPM Pro
- TPM Workplace
- The 2018 Movement Conference
- The Foundation Matrix
- Who Uses TPM
- injury prevention